<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Churches? Why Motif?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proustarchive.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=15" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proustarchive.org/?p=15</link>
	<description>A Textual / Visual Resource</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ecclesiastical Proust Archive &#187; Guest Spot on if:book &#8211;&#62; Thoughts-Illustrated</title>
		<link>http://www.proustarchive.org/?p=15#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecclesiastical Proust Archive &#187; Guest Spot on if:book &#8211;&#62; Thoughts-Illustrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proustarchive.org/?p=15#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m starting to think, as a result of writing this post, that opening this archive to the inclusion of passages and paratextual information not related to churches is probably not the way to go. (Read this post and this post for more on that topic.) There&#8217;s enough that could be done under the church rubric &#8212; say, a variorum of different translations and editions &#8212; to make it textually and scholarly interesting. The vast jumbled archive of editions, translations, articles, books, pamphlets, websites, films &#8230; &#8230; is already there. One could simply use a wiki, perhaps with customized search tools, search and make sense of all of them, which would be great. But this archive is really a tool for narrative and textual analysis. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m starting to think, as a result of writing this post, that opening this archive to the inclusion of passages and paratextual information not related to churches is probably not the way to go. (Read this post and this post for more on that topic.) There&#8217;s enough that could be done under the church rubric &#8212; say, a variorum of different translations and editions &#8212; to make it textually and scholarly interesting. The vast jumbled archive of editions, translations, articles, books, pamphlets, websites, films &#8230; &#8230; is already there. One could simply use a wiki, perhaps with customized search tools, search and make sense of all of them, which would be great. But this archive is really a tool for narrative and textual analysis. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: if:book</title>
		<link>http://www.proustarchive.org/?p=15#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>if:book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 07:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proustarchive.org/?p=15#comment-98</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ecclesiastical proust archive: starting a community&lt;/strong&gt;

(Jeff Drouin is in the English Ph.D. Program at The Graduate Center of the City University of New York) About three weeks ago I had lunch with Ben, Eddie, Dan, and Jesse to talk about starting a community with one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ecclesiastical proust archive: starting a community</strong></p>
<p>(Jeff Drouin is in the English Ph.D. Program at The Graduate Center of the City University of New York) About three weeks ago I had lunch with Ben, Eddie, Dan, and Jesse to talk about starting a community with one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
